November 2006 Election Results: Maps

Mapping done by Marc Salomon using open source software and custom code.

All color coding is the warmer the better from yellow to red, the cooler the worse from green to blue. On pick one races, the 50% boundary is demarcated by green and yellow.

Free for nonprofit use.
Rights reserved for personal gain use.
marc at cybre dot net.

SupervisorD4   |   D6   |   D8   |   D10   |  

Board of Education

Community College Board

BART

Congressional District 8

Assembly District 12

Local Props

State Props


Supervisor Elections

The color scales here are adjusted so as to maximize contrast between candidates to identify areas of relative strength.

District 4


Ed Jew


Ron Dudum


Jaynry Mak


Doug Chan


District 6


Chris Daly


Rob Black


District 8


Bevan Dufty


Alix Rosenthal


District 10


Sophie Maxwell


Multiseat Elections

Scale:
2% 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24%

BOE


MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION
VOTE FOR 3
JANE KIM. . . . . . . . . . . 66,728 14.15
HYDRA MENDOZA . . . . . . . . . 61,214 12.99
KIM-SHREE MAUFAS . . . . . . . . 51,689 10.96

Jane Kim


Jane performs strong citywide. Progressive votes progressive and APA votes APA. That, combined with a qualified talented candidate and a seasonend field team is a winning combination.

You just can't beat energetic kids on the streets campaigning for a BOE candidate.


Hyrda Mendoza


Hydra does particularly well at the heights and D11 as well as in D10 and the D2 rich strip along Lake. She holds her own citywide except in D4.

Kim-Shree Maufas


Kim-Shree delivers standard progressive turnout with support from D10 and BV/HP to put her in the winner's circle.

Jane and Hydra


A tale of two cities...
2.5% 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30%

CCB


MEMBER, COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD
VOTE FOR 3
ANITA GRIER. . . . . . . . . . 103,125 25.56
LAWRENCE WONG . . . . . . . . . 88,789 22.00
JOHN RIZZO . . . . . . . . . . 68,440 16.96

John Rizzo


John demonstrates a broad appeal, expanding from progressive strongholds to do better than most progressives in normally moderate or swing districts like D1, D4 and D11, while performing in Potrero and holding his ownn in D3 and even D2 to an extent.

Bruce Wolfe


Bruce also does not get creamed anywhere except for D7 and the Marina citywide, but does cannot develop enough strength to compete.

Johnnie Carter



John and Johnnie


Not so different from Jane and Hydra...

One on One Races

Scale:
10% 20 30 40 45 <=50 55 60 70 80 90 100%

BART


BART DIRECTOR - BART DIST. 8
VOTE FOR 1
JAMES FANG . . . . . . . . . . 47,908 59.70
EMILY DEANNA DRENNEN. . . . . . . 31,929 39.79

Emily Drennan


What can you say when the local Democratic and Labor power brokers decide to back a Republican instead of a progressive bisexual woman who happens to be a Green?

James Fang


Your results would look like this too if your family owned a local newspaper.

CD8


U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DIST. 8
VOTE FOR 1
NANCY PELOSI (DEM) . . . . . . . 148,435 80.27
MIKE DENUNZIO (REP) . . . . . . . 19,800 10.71
KRISSY KEEFER (GRN) . . . . . . . 13,653 7.38

Krissy Keefer


This is what happens when your opponent is deemed speaker-designate in mid-Septembebr.

Nancy Pelosi


The Democrats managed to remain standing until after the election this time while the Republicans careened to the floor.

Assembly District 12


MEMBER, STATE ASSEMBLY DIST. 12
VOTE FOR 1
FIONA MA (DEM). . . . . . . . . 64,725 70.31
HOWARD EPSTEIN (REP). . . . . . . 14,777 16.05
BARRY HERMANSON (GRN) . . . . . . 12,382 13.45
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 176 .19

Barry Hermanson



Gain turned up to identify possible progressive opportunity sites.

Local Props

Scale:
10% 20 30 40 45 <=50 55 60 70 80 90 100%

School Bond


MEASURE A
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 171,236 73.85
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,640 26.15

Needed 55%, sailed through.

Allowing Members of Boards and Commissions to Participate in Meetings by Teleconference due to Pregnancy and Related Conditions; Adoption of Parental Leave Policies


MEASURE B
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 164,166 72.22
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,157 27.78

Noncontroversial.

Setting Salaries of Certain Local Elected Officials


MEASURE C
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,561 63.33
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,396 36.67

Noncontroversial.

Disclosure of Private Information


MEASURE D
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 143,020 64.35
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,230 35.65

Noncontroversial.

Parking Tax Ordinance


MEASURE E
VOTE FOR 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,628 67.23
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,922 32.77

No campaign, got creamed.

Paid Sick Leave Ordinance


MEASURE F
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 120,916 52.93
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,541 47.07

Progressive core with expansion to D1, D3, D10 and D11.

Limitations on Formula Retail Stores


MEASURE G
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,728 58.19
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,353 41.81

Progressive core with expansion to D1, D3, D10 and D11.

Relocation Assistance for No Fault Tenant Removal


MEASURE H
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 120,916 52.93
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 107,541 47.07

Strong support at the progressive core with expansions to Chinatown, Surfer Strip, Bayview/Hunters Point and SF State.

Adopting a Policy that the Mayor Appear Monthly at a Board of Supervisors Meeting


MEASURE I
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 126,023 56.36
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,567 43.64

A big win for a sleeper campaign. Similar conservative opposition as to Prop H. Now let's see the fireworks as the Mayor, who apparently has 80% approval ratings in the public opnion polls tries to ignore Prop I as merely a public opinion poll.

Adopting a Policy Calling for the Impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney


MEASURE J
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,042 58.53
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,282 41.47

Now we know where the Republicans live.

Adopting a Policy Relating to the Housing Needs of Seniors and Disabled Adults


MEASURE K
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 161,684 71.30
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,073 28.70

No brainer.

State Props

Scale:
10% 20 30 40 45 <=50 55 60 70 80 90 100%

1A : Transportation Funding Protection. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.


STATE PROP 1A
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,872 68.42
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,243 31.58


1B : Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006.


STATE PROP 1B
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,620 64.75
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,073 35.25


1C : Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006.


STATE PROP 1C
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,112 72.59
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,999 27.41

Where do ya think we have a housing crisis?

1D : Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006.


STATE PROP 1D
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,869 72.83
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,478 27.17


1E : Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006.


STATE PROP 1E
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 177,324 76.02
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,940 23.98


83 : Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring. Initiative Statute.


STATE PROP 83
VOTE FOR 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,814 52.43
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 111,423 47.57

LGBT know what its like to be on the receiving end of a sex panic witch hunt.

84 : Water Quality, Safety and Supply. Flood Control. Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements. Bonds. Initiative Statute.


STATE PROP 84
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 167,818 72.15
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,784 27.85


85 : Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.


STATE PROP 85
VOTE FOR 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 181,347 76.28
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,379 23.72

What can we say?

86 : Tax on Cigarettes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.


STATE PROP 86
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 162,155 67.33
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,683 32.67


87 : Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil Producers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.


STATE PROP 87
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 173,892 71.59
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 68,999 28.41


88 : Education Funding. Real Property Parcel Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.


STATE PROP 88
VOTE FOR 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 147,537 62.39
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 88,931 37.61

Parcel taxes are regressive and nonviable.

89 : Political Campaigns. Public Financing. Corporate Tax Increase. Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limits. Initiative Statute.


STATE PROP 89
VOTE FOR 1
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 120,414 51.57
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,075 48.43


90 : Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.


STATE PROP 90
VOTE FOR 1
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 165,769 70.95
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,865 29.05

San Franciscans like our zoning.